To implement evbuffer_expand() properly, you need to be able to
replace the last chunk that has data, which means that we need to keep
track of the the next pointer pointing to the last_with_data chunk,
not the last_with_data chunk itself.
Previously, our default lock model kind of assumed that every lock was
potentially a read-write lock. This was a poor choice, since
read-write locks are far more expensive than regular locks, and so the
lock API should only use them when we can actually take advantage of
them. Neither our pthreads or win32 lock implementation provided rw
locks.
Now that we have a way (not currently used!) to indicate that we
really want a read-write lock, we shouldn't actually say "lock this
for reading" or "lock this for writing" unless we mean it.
This patch from Chris Davis saves some callback depth, and adds proper
ref-counting to bufferevents when there's a deferred evbuffer callback
inflight. It could use a couple more comments to really nail down what
its invariants are.
svn:r1543
This is code by Chris Davis, with changes to get the unit tests failing less aggressively.
The unit tests for this code do not completely pass yet; Chris is looking into that. If they aren't passing by the next release, I'll turn off this code.
svn:r1499
Chris Davis points out that GetQueuedCompletionStatus
sometimes returns false not to report "No events for
you!" but instead to report "An overlapped operation
failed." Add a way to tell an event_overlapped that
its operation failed.
svn:r1490
OpenSSL uses something like this to implement get/set access for
properties on its BIOs, so that it doesn't need to add a pair of
get/set functions to the vtable struct for every new abstract property
it provides an accessor for.
Doing this lets us make bufferevent_setfd abstract, and implement an
abstract bufferevent_getfd.
svn:r1284
Either I need to make the callbacks get deferred in a base with no events (doable), or I need to make it okay to call launch_read from inside the callback for read (tricky).
svn:r1277
