From a778472461f67e4f47e9a96cbf50b3d089d5dec1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: erelling <54530323+erelling@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 01:21:50 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Update n00b-gettingStarted.md

---
 docs/n00b-gettingStarted.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/docs/n00b-gettingStarted.md b/docs/n00b-gettingStarted.md
index 57df871f2..0b5473894 100644
--- a/docs/n00b-gettingStarted.md
+++ b/docs/n00b-gettingStarted.md
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ Save this to a html file and fetch it with a browser from the web server (or jus
 **Three additional comments from Knut, the creator of mermaid:**
 - In early versions of mermaid, the `<script src>` tag was invoked in the `<head>` part of the web page. Nowdays we can place it directly in `<body>` as seen above. However, the documentation still frequently reflects the old way which still works.
   
-- We initialize the mermaid rendering with `mermaid.initialize()` directly in the html code. In principle this could be done through placing `mermaid.initialize()` inside of `mermaid.min.js`. We would then eliminate the need for this explicit line in the html. However, there are use cases where we do want to separate the two steps. Sometimes we want full control over when we start looking for `<div>`tags inside the web page, i.e. running `mermaid.initialize()`, as all `<div>` tags may not have loaded when `mermaid.min.js` runs.
+- We initialize the mermaid rendering with `mermaid.initialize()` directly in the html code. In principle this could be done through placing `mermaid.initialize()` inside of `mermaid.min.js`. We would then eliminate the need for this explicit line in the html. However, there are use cases where we do want to separate the two steps. Sometimes we want full control over when we start looking for `<div>`tags inside the web page, i.e. running `mermaid.initialize()`, for example when we know that all `<div>` tags may not have loaded when `mermaid.min.js` runs.
 
 - In the example above, `mermaid.min.js` is called using an absolute path. Even worse, the example includes the mermaid version number which of course will change as time goes by. However, the example makes it easy to understand what is going on - even though it is doomed in a way we do not want in a production environment. When going from testing mermaid out to getting serious with it, I would suggest one of the following approaches for calling `mermaid.min.js`:
   
